Today, it is a truth universally acknowledged that anyone in possession of a great fortune must be despicable in one way or another. At least, that’s how the fictional rich are portrayed in movies, television, and novels. As for the actual rich, there are enough bad actors among them to provide an endless stream of media stories demonstrating human nature at its worst. While I see no conspiracy, I do suspect an implicit “deal.” Great inequality can be allowed to persist as long as popular envy is blunted by the idea that being rich is no guarantee against failed lives.
The surefire way to transmute envy into schadenfreude is to focus on dysfunctional families of the rich. So it can be a therapeutic relief to be a voyeur into the familial failures of the wealthy, fictional or real. This relief is something not at all new to our current times. 1
What prompted me to write this post was my recent read of my favorite new novel of the year, Emma Cline’s “The Guest.” It’s set in the Hamptons and follows Alex, a 22 year-old call girl, scratching and clawing to survive the end of the Hamptons summer. It’s Labor Day week and, like a twisted version of Odysseus, Alex must use her wiles to confront a cavalcade of vapid, foolish, unhappy rich people.
Alex as the protagonist is a true original and to Cline’s credit I still can’t decide how to feel about her. The rest of the characters represent familiar tropes, no matter how well sketched. The late middle-aged men who use young girls as arm-candy, the mostly absent father and his resentful, mentally ill son, the personal assistants appended at the whip-end of the whims of their masters and mistresses, the aging women with obsessively exercised slim legs struggling to appear decades younger (at least from a distance), the house-sharing, declasse twenty-somethings, and the obligatory unsupervised, privileged teenagers doing drugs and hooking up. At the grown-up parties we attend as literary guests of Alex, we listen to snatches of dull conversation dominated by the meme of “how beautiful it is out here.”
In other words, “The Guest” is guaranteed to confirm for readers all the stereotypes about the Hamptons. And it will confirm to those who do not “summer” there, whether by choice or budget, that they are hardly missing out, but instead have dodged a bullet.
As for those of us who do spend time out there, I guarantee that many of us will buy and read (or claim to have read) this book. And I equally guarantee that we will all say, “That’s not me at all! That’s not the Hamptons I know! I’d never say things like that or even think them.” And while I might claim the same, there are a few passages that struck home. Both because they’re so well written and because they’re true. And because in fact while I read them, I nodded along.
Alex’s fifty something boyfriend brings her to a dinner party at one of those rare, magical houses perched high enough above the ocean so that her view
“…was only water, flat and silvered, appearing to stretch from the edge of the terrace to the hot-pink line of the horizon. What would it be like to live here, to occupy this unfettered beauty every day? Could you become used to the shock of water? The envy acted like adrenaline in Alex’s body, a swift and enlivening rush to the head. It was better, sometimes, to never know certain things existed.”
Here's Alex a few days later sitting outside at another estate, this one with expansive, pristine lawns and gardens. She’s gained entry through false pretenses. She hears a leaf blower and a lawn mower and watches the ceaseless circuit of a man removing garbage.
“So much effort and noise required to cultivate this landscape, a landscape meant to invoke peace and quiet. The appearance of calm demanded an endless campaign of violent intervention.”
Finally, here’s Alex’s thoughts about the twenty-something house-share people she meets.
“They would leave here Monday night, imagining they had gotten close to something, had some rarified experience. The truth was that the world they imagined would never include them.”
Emma Cline did not invent the rich people who populate her book. They undoubtedly exist. But I don’t think they’re in the majority. I wonder what would happen if the modern rich were portrayed in a more balanced way, equally good or bad as any other class of people, except with the great, advantageous ease of life that wealth can provide. Would there then be an even greater outcry against inequality? Or, more to the point, would there be more of an impetus to take redistributive action.
Downton Abbey is an example of a balanced portrayal of the rich. Who could hate Lord Grantham? There are the Dickens novels populated by kindly rich benefactors to offset sinister aristocrats. But it’s hard for me to think of any recent, culturally influential work of fiction in any medium, set in our century, that portrays the rich in a flattering way.
Perhaps such a work would be a complete commercial flop.
I suppose I’m musing about whether in a subtle, almost subliminal way attitudes toward inequality are softened by the preponderance of stories where the rich self-sabotage themselves into unhappy or even tragic circumstances. Could the schadenfreude produced by these stories be the modern equivalent of bread and circuses?
A few thousand years ago, we had Oedipus killing his father, marrying his mother, and then, after realizing what he’s done, blinding himself. A little less on the nose (sorry, Sophocles), Shakespeare’s King Lear falls into enfeebled, impotent madness when he chooses the wrong daughters to trust. Then, as with many of the endings of the Tragedies, most of the characters die violent deaths.
Skipping centuries, “Succession” is an obvious and worthy modern heir of reveling in the misery of the rich. But “Succession” is also too “on the nose” and, as great as it was, it’s so over the top that the story of the rich Roys comes close, like Oedipus, to being mythological (a myth I will re-watch many times!)
Apologies for over sharing, which I tend to do on Substack more and more. I’m more privileged than most, but no one would call me rich. The richest families I think I’ve ever met have a family life that I certainly don’t envy, they have revealed themselves to be either pits of vipers. But probably the best man I’ve known in my life was also one of the richest. My dad’s family were warm and kind people who came from pretty much nothing in the South and raised their 5 kids in a 900 sf house with 1 bathroom for about 30 years. Their firstborn became an accountant that had a reputation of being honest and trustworthy, and the blueblood executives he would encounter recognized this lifted him up to their level (as Vonnegut would say, they gave him a straw on the Money River) and he became the CFO of a major regional bank. He was like my surrogate dad bc they both had the same terminal illness, both had double lung transplants but my uncle’s gave him 15 more years. Not only was he a big philanthropist, funding transplants for those who couldn’t afford it, but he would do shit like go volunteer at the lowest performing schools in the most impoverished parts of Memphis to tutor poor black kids in reading after school. He was the only Democrat among his brothers and sisters and thought billionaires shouldn’t exist, as I don’t. He didn’t think folks should be allowed to have large fortunes. While I thought I might get enough to pay off my $200K student loans when he died as I knew he had been an executive, but expected little as there were something like 4 siblings, his new wife, his late wife’s many siblings, and at least 10 other nieces and nephews and a few of their children. It turned out we all were surprised, relatively late in life (I had a doctorate and 2 masters degrees at 36, he passed afterward) enough in trust that none of us will ever be homeless if we are careful and we have yo work at something to have a nice life, which divided among that many heirs meant the total sum was a pretty decent chunk of change though not billions. Imagine finding out you’re a trust fund baby at 38 after ridiculing them most of your life! It’s a weird, but healthy, sense of guilt. As a banker he was one of the ones warning against getting too involved with subprime in 08 (he had stepped back to be demoted to risk mgt VP.) he was a very small ‘c’ conservative and moral man. I would trade every asset I have to have him back in the world. He was a devout Southern Christian that loved my husband as his own and never judged me, or at least never made me feel judged, when I fucked my life up pretty bad at one point and had to go to rehab. Half of my serious relationships have been with black people, women before I came out and then my first boyfriend, and he was genuinely warm and kind to them, taking us to dinner as couples and stuff.
I will say that those who are blessed enough to leave anything significant to multiple heirs is something that can foster weird resentments if they aren’t careful to be fair, I’m glad to have worked through mine. Its a weird curse that comes with a blessing, but you can’t help but feel that the way it gets dished out is the measure of their love for you, and I realize some things are impossible to make fair. I wish that we had talked about it as a whole family before he was in a lot of pain but when he knew the end was close, because we all get along as a family, and some things that I’m sure he wasn’t thinking about turn out to be deeply unfair. Like surviving widows getting something and surviving widowers being SOL bc of old beliefs that men should work means my brother-in-law would lose the cushion he has raising their 3 children if my sister were to die, and then they would inherit less than other cousins. It’s so stupid to look at a blessing like that as something that fosters resentment, never at him but other relatives who by chance fall differently in the contracts. (I’ve encouraged my masculine as hell mechanic BIL to move to WA long enough to get declared a trans woman on his official docs just to protect him and the kids in case something were to happen to my sister.
Things like this are why rich families are often toxic, I think. Money and legal contracts are poor stand-ins for love. he loved us equally but it’s impossible to be fair in the end. God, the love I’ve been given by that side of the family. My dad died in 97 and there was never a drifting apart, our entire extended family celebrated holidays together til just a few years ago, and I won’t lie that a couple of those years I didn’t go was because some aunts and cousins who are wonderful people and always shown me love for 40 years were people that brought out unfair resentments after we had all been blessed with a windfall none of us “deserved.” We are dumb primates, the best and worst of us.
SN: that’s the opposite of how it is in academia at second-tier state schools, where the petty fights between the professors are vicious bc the spoils of winning are so small, like 10 cats fighting over a dead baby gerbil. LOL
I’m probably the only guy on Earth that doesn’t hate Bezos and thinks he’s a good guy, which this comes from having done my MBA thesis on Amazon’s corporate strategy. He was a genius, he came by it honestly, he was privileged and well to do, but Miguel Bezos was no Fred Trump. He was very lucky to have had the nature and nurture he was gifted with (an iconoclast entrepreneur but poor bio dad, parents that nurtured his education and believed in his business - but not rich enough to put many millions into it - and a maternal grandpa that was high up at Los Alamos ) and he had to cultivate the persona of acting like a frugal dick to get the shareholders to indulge him so many years of reinvesting profits in new ventures - now the cheapest way to build a business website and scale it up is AWS instead of something like Oracle. Someone could have developed Amazon e-commerce first; I’m glad it wasn’t Musk or one of the Waltons or some awful Republican that would be paying $7.25/hour in the warehouses in the South. While minimum wage should surely be double that, you can make $15 in fast food in Memphis despite the min wage of half that bc of competition for labor from the Amazon warehouse. A man who earned the love of someone for years as decent as Mackenzie is not an evil man. He took the long view, knowing Icahn would start demanding dividends were the day 1 philosophy to be abandoned. Folks accuse him of building Blue Origin so he can escape the earth he destroyed, which is not only absurd but he literally talked about his passion for space in his hs valedictory address. He comes by his wonder of space from his childhood and deserves to indulge his dream within reason. Billionaires as a group are the problem, the fact of their existence, most of the actual people are just victims of a series of accidents like the rest of us, they just happen to be lucky accidents.
That said, I think huge amounts of inequality is corrosive to a people, and we need lots more e pluribus unum in this world. It wouldn’t be workable unless folks actually came to agreement on it, but my political philosophy entails no individual owning $1,000,000,001 in any form of wealth, and all US tax returns should be public record. Either it’s seized by the government or ideally freely given out of patriotism and burned on the Fourth of July or those folks pay their workers or donate to charity to rid themselves of it. And priceless art that folks shelter their wealth in should just be considered rented. It’s hard but not undosble if we could get unity again, it’s necessary for it. Note I don’t say it should be taxed. We should print the money necessary for everyone to have a decent standard of living as a UBI (ideally fully automated luxury communism) completely separately and unrelated to the bonfires of billionaire cash on 7/4. So many feel taxes are theft from their hard work to give to an “undeserving other.” decouple the 2, start the ubi stuff first and unrelatedly. The levels of inequality or toxic to us as a people, they divide is, and burning that cash should be a point of pride rather than resentment. It’s patriotism. We are Americans. Perhaps we could sweeten the deal by giving special honors to those who have to engage in such sacrifice - for example make Bezos the Duke of Amazon and Gates the Count of Microsoft and giving them permanent seats in the WA state legislature as an honor to recognize them for their accomplishments, service to the state, and patriotism in their sacrifice. I think it’s not the end of the world when one’s civic leaders and major employers are often aligned.
Schitt's Creek maybe? Also I think you need to qualify this as the "ultra rich" - I'm pretty sure we see the "rich" all the time in TV shows enjoying their very comfortable multi-million dollar lives ;) The show Suits comes to mind...